I had an excellent concept again in 2012. What if I may create a system primarily based on a quarterback’s manufacturing in school that might give us a sign as to whether or not they would achieve success on the NFL degree?
Nicely, I failed.
It seems there is no such thing as a option to predict a QB’s future primarily based on previous efficiency as a result of there’s a lot extra that goes into the place than the participant. There’s the surroundings, the encompassing workforce, the teaching workers and plenty of luck. Nonetheless, whereas I’ve by no means been in a position to crack the QB code, I’ve continued utilizing my system yearly since 2012 for a easy cause: It is accomplished an honest job, even when it does not have all of the solutions.
Principally, the system charges quarterbacks on throwing capacity, not dashing. It is broke down into three classes: towards top-50 defenses, third-and-long/fourth-down conditions and the purple zone. After shoving all these numbers into the machine, it spits out a rating for every participant. That rating is then taken and in comparison with the common rating of the quarterback class being graded, which is added to the record of all of the quarterbacks rated up to now.
Earlier than we dive into additional element, let’s take a look at the scores for the 2024 class of quarterbacks.
1. |
Caleb Williams |
USC |
8.98% |
3,633 yards, 30 TD, 5 INT |
2. |
J.J. McCarthy |
Michigan |
7.64% |
2,991 yards, 22 TD, 4 INT |
3. |
Jayden Daniels |
LSU |
2.93% |
3,812 yards, 40 TD, 4 INT |
4. |
Spencer Rattler |
South Carolina |
2.71% |
3,186 yards, 19 TD, 8 INT |
5. |
Bo Nix |
Oregon |
1.84% |
4,508 yards, 45 TD, 3 INT |
6. |
Austin Reed |
Western Kentucky |
0.71% |
3,340 yards, 31 TD, 11 INT |
7. |
Drake Maye |
North Carolina |
0.25% |
3,608 yards, 24 TD, 9 INT |
8. |
Michael Penix |
Washington |
-0.26% |
4,903 yards, 36 TD, 11 INT |
9. |
Sam Hartman |
Notre Dame |
-0.31% |
2,689 yards, 24 TD, 8 INT |
10. |
Jordan Travis |
Florida State |
-0.32% |
2,756 yards, 20 TD, 2 INT |
11. |
Devin Leary |
Kentucky |
-1.46% |
2,746 yards, 25 TD, 12 INT |
12. |
Kedon Slovis |
BYU |
-2.76% |
1,716 yards, 12 TD, 6 INT |
13. |
Michael Pratt |
Tulane |
-3.06% |
2,406 yards, 22 TD, 5 INT |
14. |
Joe Milton |
Tennessee |
-3.38% |
2,813 yards, 20 TD, 5 INT |
The scoring is straightforward. Caleb Williams checks in with a rating of 8.98%, which suggests his rating was 8.98% higher than the common rating of the 14 quarterbacks listed. Joe Milton’s rating of -3.38% means he completed 3.38% beneath the common.
Of the 14 quarterbacks rated on this class, Williams and J.J. McCarthy are the one two to put up scores that crack the highest 20 of gamers graded for the reason that 2012 class. Here is the highest 20.
1. |
Tua Tagovailoa |
13.71% |
2. |
Andrew Luck |
9.75% |
3. |
Dwayne Haskins |
9.52% |
4. |
Kyler Murray |
9.43% |
5. |
Caleb Williams |
8.98% |
6. |
Johnny Manziel |
8.98% |
7. |
Robert Griffin |
8.67% |
8. |
Baker Mayfield |
8.22% |
9. |
Justin Fields |
8.12% |
10. |
Mitch Trubisky |
8.11% |
11. |
J.J. McCarthy |
7.64% |
12. |
Jameis Winston |
6.88% |
13. |
Sam Darnold |
6.50% |
14. |
Marcus Mariota |
6.23% |
15. |
Logan Woodside |
6.19% |
16. |
Jared Goff |
5.62% |
17. |
Patrick Mahomes |
5.57% |
18. |
Jack Coan |
5.53% |
19. |
D’Eriq King |
5.26% |
20. |
Blake Bortles |
4.89% |
In the event you take a look at the highest 20, your preliminary response might be one thing alongside the traces of “OK, there are some respectable names there, however exterior of Patrick Mahomes, there aren’t many greats in there.”
Nicely, duh. There aren’t many nice quarterbacks within the NFL! There are solely a handful within the league at any given time. That is why we contemplate them nice!
The popular focus right here is on the truth that of the highest 20, there are much more gamers who’ve gone on to have lengthy NFL careers than there are busts. Even Mitch Trubisky and Marcus Mariota had been nonetheless getting begins final season, whereas Sam Darnold might be in line for some himself this season.
Then there’s the opposite finish of the spectrum. If historical past is any indicator, you do not need your workforce drafting Michael Penix Jr. or another gamers with below-average scores. The one gamers with below-average scores who’ve gone on to have distinctive NFL careers are Josh Allen and Lamar Jackson. What have they got in frequent? Each are wonderful rushers, and this system solely charges gamers primarily based on their passing. The jury remains to be out on different previous below-average scorers like Anthony Richardson and Will Levis (I am going to let followers fake it is nonetheless out on Daniel Jones, Kenny Pickett and Desmond Ridder, too).
As for the gamers on this class, as many as 5 are anticipated to go within the first spherical. Let’s go over the six gamers most frequently mocked within the first spherical with a proof of the place they had been strongest and weakest and the way it impacted their scores.
Caleb Williams
The numbers match the tape. The best way Williams’ 2024 season will get mentioned, you’d suppose he had a horrible yr. However you then take a look at the numbers, and he completed with 30 touchdowns to solely 5 interceptions. It seems that he was fantastic … it was simply the workforce that stunk. Anyway, it was an entire efficiency for Williams within the system. His worst rating got here in third- and fourth-down conditions, and it was the second-highest within the class. His performances towards prime defenses and within the purple zone ranked the perfect within the class. There is a cause he is going No. 1 general, however possibly Bears followers ought to mood their expectations. In spite of everything, whereas they did not have top-five scores like Williams, Justin Fields and Mitch Trubisky are within the prime 10 all-time. If both had labored out, it would not be the Bears in place to draft Williams this yr.
J.J. McCarthy
McCarthy’s rating is carried by two classes. He is second within the class behind Williams towards prime defenses, and his rating in third- and fourth-down conditions is the best ever recorded in these rankings. It carried plenty of weight and helped offset that his red-zone efficiency ranked solely sixth within the class. Whereas it wasn’t a nasty rating, the red-zone numbers had been solely barely above common. That is price monitoring as a result of McCarthy has a robust arm, however red-zone performs do the perfect job of mirroring the form of home windows these gamers will likely be coping with on each snap on the NFL degree.
Jayden Daniels
Daniels did not end increased than third in any class, however he is a type of gamers who can slip by means of the cracks in these scores. The Heisman Trophy winner’s legs are an enormous a part of his recreation however, once more, haven’t any impression right here. Plus, whereas Daniels was phenomenal in 2023, his total profession goes into these rankings, and the 2021 season was a little bit of an anchor. The first concern is his rating within the purple zone. It ranked ninth within the class and was beneath common all-time. He was nice at hitting his receivers when there was plenty of discipline to work with, however as the sphere shrank, his arm wasn’t practically as efficient.
Bo Nix
From an NFL perspective, the knock on Bo Nix will likely be his arm energy, which confirmed in his scores. Nix’s scores towards top-50 defenses — and he had a big pattern dimension because of his time within the SEC — ranked third behind Williams and McCarthy, however he ranked fifth in third/fourth downs and seventh within the purple zone. Nix threw plenty of brief passes within the Oregon offense that allowed his receivers to do work after the catch. The efficiency suffered when he was pressured to make use of his arm energy to maintain the chains shifting or put factors on the board.
Drake Maye
Maye’s rating is not sophisticated. His red-zone efficiency was horrible. He completed fifth within the class towards prime defenses and fourth on third and fourth downs. Each his scores had been solidly above common all-time. However his purple zone rating ranked thirteenth — effectively beneath common. Maye’s accuracy suffered within the purple zone, and he didn’t throw touchdowns at a excessive fee. His numbers dipped in 2023, nevertheless it’s not like they had been excellent in 2022.
Michael Penix
It in all probability comes as a shock given Penix’s uncooked numbers and the explosiveness of the Washington offense lately, however once we seemed below the hood, his numbers did not match up effectively with the competitors. He ranked eighth towards prime defenses, sixth in third- and fourth-down conditions and eleventh within the purple zone. Of these three, solely his third/fourth-down rating completed above common all-time (he was, like, a millimeter beneath common towards prime defenses). Like Maye, the red-zone rating dragged him down.
Fornelli’s precise QB Massive Board
Whereas the scores are a pleasant piece of information to make use of, they’re simply numbers on the finish of the day. My title is on the score, however my last QB board is not primarily based merely on these numbers. It is a mixture of what we have seen from these gamers in school, how effectively their video games translate to the NFL and their ceiling in the event that they attain their full potential. With all that in thoughts, here is how my last QB massive board appears forward of the 2024 NFL Draft.
- Caleb Williams
- Drake Maye
- J.J. McCarthy
- Jayden Daniels
- Michael Penix
- Spencer Rattler
- Bo Nix
- Michael Pratt
If we had been to tier them, Williams can be a tier unto himself. Then we might have Maye, McCarthy and Daniels in a tier earlier than attending to Nix, Penix, Rattler and the remaining.